• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1748 (1995); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.115037 (3 pages)

Current transport in as‐grown and annealed intermediate temperature molecular beam epitaxy grown GaAs

B. Nabet1, A. Youtz1, F. Castro1, P. Cooke2, and A. Paolella2

1Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
2Army Research Laboratory, EPSD Directorate, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey 07703

(Received 5 May 1995; accepted 14 July 1995)

Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) GaAs grown in the intermediate temperature range of about 400 °C may provide combination of low lifetime, high resistivity, and high mobility. We compare current conduction in unannealed and annealed material grown at 400 °C by fabricating photodetectors on substrates grown between temperature ranges of 250–500 °C. The unannealed version of the device grown at 400 °C shows substantial difference of conduction properties in dark and under light. It is shown that while at low biases the unannealed material may be semi‐insulating, at high biases more current is conducted than in annealed material. We attribute this to the effect of intergap states on current conduction and suggest that defect state assisted tunneling is the dominant current transport mechanism in these ranges. Quenching of response by light suggests that occupancy of traps can eliminate their role in current conduction. © 1995 American Institute of Physics.

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 81.15.Hi

    Molecular, atomic, ion, and chemical beam epitaxy

  • 73.61.Ey

    III-V semiconductors

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0003-6951 (print)  
1077-3118 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    S. Gupta, M. Y. Frankel, J. A. Valdmanis, J. F. Whitaker, G. A. Mourou, F. W. Smith, and A. R. Calawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3276 (1991)APPLAB000059000025003276000001.

    D. C. Look, D. C. Walters, M. Meir, C. E. Stutz, and S. K. Brierly, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2900 (1992)APPLAB000060000023002900000001.

    D. C. Look, G. D. Robinson, J. R. Sizelove, and C. E. Stutz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 3004 (1993)APPLAB000062000023003004000001.

    X. Liu, A. Prasad, W. M. Chen, A. Kurpiewski, A. Stoschek, Z. Liliental-Weber, and E. R. Weber, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 3002 (1994)APPLAB000065000023003002000001.

    B. Nabet, A. Paollela, P. Cooke, M. L. Lemune, R. B. Moerkirk, and L. C. Liou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3151 (1994)APPLAB000064000023003151000001.

    E. R. Brown, K. A. McIntosh, K. B. Nichols, and D. C. Dennis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 285 (1995)APPLAB000066000003000285000001.

    D. C. Look, Z-Q. Fang, J. R. Sizelove, and C. E. Stutz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 465 (1993).

    E. S. Harmon, M. R. Melloch, J. M. Woodal, D. D. Nolte, N. Otsuka, and L. Chang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 2248 (1993)APPLAB000063000016002248000001.

    J. K. Luo, H. Thomas, D. V. Morgan, and D. Westwood, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3614 (1994)APPLAB000064000026003614000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close