• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

FREE

FULL-TEXT OPTIONS:

Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 183303 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3424792 (3 pages)

Efficient charge injection from a high work function metal in high mobility n-type polymer field-effect transistors

M. Caironi1,2, C. Newman3, J. R. Moore1, D. Natali2,4, H. Yan3, A. Facchetti3, and H. Sirringhaus1

1Cavendish Laboratory, J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
2Center for Nano Science and Technology, IIT@PoliMi, Via Pascoli 70/3, 20133 Milano, Italy
3Polyera Corporation, 8045 Lamon Avenue, Skokie, Illinois 60077, USA
4Politecnico di Milano, D.E.I., Piazza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy

View MapView Map

(Received 8 January 2010; accepted 13 April 2010; published online 5 May 2010)

We demonstrate efficient electron injection from a high work function metal in staggered transistors based on the high mobility poly{[N,N-bis(2-octyldodecyl)-naphthalene-1,4,5,8-bis(dicarboximide)-2,6-diyl]-alt-5,5′-(2,2′-bithiophene)}. Channel length scaling shows that the linear mobility for electrons remains higher than 0.1 cm2/V s when reducing the channel length to a few micrometers. Field-enhanced injection favors downscaling at a fixed lateral voltage and reduces the contact resistance to 11 kΩ cm at high gate voltages for channels of only a few micrometers. The contacts are asymmetric, with the source contribution dominating the overall resistance, consistent with an injection limited regime rather than bulk-limited as generally found in staggered transistors.

© 2010 American Institute of Physics

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0003-6951 (print)  
1077-3118 (online)

  1. L. Bürgi et al., J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6129 (2003)JAPIAU000094000009006129000001.
  2. B. A. Gregg et al., Chem. Mater. 16, 4586 (2004).
  3. M. Kitamura et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 033313 (2008)APPLAB000093000003033313000001.
  4. C. R. Newman et al., Chem. Mater. 16, 4436 (2004).
  5. J. Zaumseil and H. Sirringhaus, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 107, 1296 (2007). [MEDLINE]
  6. H. Usta et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 5586 (2009).
  7. S. Braun et al., Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 21, 1450 (2009).
  8. T. J. Richards and H. Sirringhaus, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 094510 (2007)JAPIAU000102000009094510000001.
  9. P. V. Pesavento et al., J. Appl. Phys. 96, 7312 (2004)JAPIAU000096000012007312000001.
  10. S. P. Tiwari et al., J. Appl. Phys. 106, 054504 (2009)JAPIAU000106000005054504000001.
  11. X. Cheng et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 2407 (2009).
  12. H. Yan et al., Nature (London) 457, 679 (2009). [MEDLINE]
  13. Z. Chen et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 8 (2009). [MEDLINE]
  14. S. Luan and G. W. Neudeck, J. Appl. Phys. 72, 766 (1992)JAPIAU000072000002000766000001.
  15. D. Natali et al., J. Appl. Phys. 101, 014501 (2007)JAPIAU000101000001014501000001.
  16. J. -F. Chang et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. (to be published).
  17. Due to L dependence of RC0, gTLM is strictly not applicable, even though the error is limited on the shortest channels where the total resistance is dominated by the gateable part. Since Rc0 is assumed to be VG-independent in DM, its dependence on L can be unambiguously attributed to a dependence on the electric field. VT dependence on L only affects the gate-voltage dependent term. In our case VT was equal to 12 V, 14.5 V, and 15.3 V for L=6.5  µm, 11.5  µm, and 21.5  µm, respectively. Likely due to short channel effects, the DM method could not be applied for L=3.5  µm
  18. R. J. Chesterfield et al., J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6396 (2004)JAPIAU000095000011006396000001. [ISI]
  19. C. -S. Chiang et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 37, 5914 (1998).
  20. N. F. Mott and R. W. Gurney, Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals (Oxford University Press, London, 1940).


Figures (click on thumbnails to view enlargements)

FIG.1
(a) Transfer and (b) output curves for a P(NDI2OD-T2) FET with L = 21.5 μm and W = 1 mm. (c) Linear μe vs L. (d) Schematic cross-section of a FET.

FIG.1 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.2
(a) RC×W at VD = 5 V as a function of VG as obtained with various methods. (b) RC×W extracted with gFPP at VD = 1, 3, and 5 V for a device with L = 30 μm. (c) RS×W and RD×W for a device with L = 40 μm measured at VD = 5 V with gFPP, with a first source/drain contacts configuration (black circles) and with swapped contacts (white circles).

FIG.2 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.3
(a) Current density at the source and at the drain contacts vs the corresponding voltage drop at VG = 60 V. (b) J vs the average applied field in a Al/P(NDI2OD-T2)/Al diode (squares) and best fitting to Mott–Gurney law by assuming a dielectric constant of 3 (dashed line).

FIG.3 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close