• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 262509 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3459148 (3 pages)

Effect of structural relaxation and oxidation conditions on interlayer exchange coupling in Fe|MgO|Fe tunnel junctions

H. X. Yang1, M. Chshiev1,2, A. Kalitsov1, A. Schuhl1, and W. H. Butler2

1SPINTEC, UMR-8191, CEA-INAC/CNRS/UJF—Grenoble 1/Grenoble-INP, Grenoble 38054, France
2MINT Center, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0209, USA

View MapView Map

(Received 23 February 2010; accepted 10 June 2010; published online 1 July 2010)

The effect of structural relaxation and interfacial oxidation is demonstrated from first principles to have a crucial impact on interlayer exchange coupling (IEC) in crystalline Fe|MgO|Fe magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs). It is shown that the IEC becomes antiferromagnetic for the relaxed structure in contrast to ferromagnetic for unrelaxed Fe|MgO|Fe MTJs. Furthermore, the antiferromagnetic IEC is strongly enhanced in the presence of oxygen vacancies while it is decreased by overoxidation and may even become ferromagnetic for sufficiently high oxygen concentration at the Fe∣MgO interface. These results were supported using a tight-binding model and provide an explanation for recent experimental studies.

© 2010 American Institute of Physics

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 75.70.Cn

    Magnetic properties of interfaces (multilayers, superlattices, heterostructures)

  • 75.50.Ee

    Antiferromagnetics

  • 81.65.Mq

    Oxidation

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0003-6951 (print)  
1077-3118 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    P. Grünberg, R. Schreiber, M. B. Brodskey, and H. Sowers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2442 (1986).

    J. Faure-Vincent, C. Tiusan, C. Bellouard, E. Popova, M. Hehn, F. Montaigne, and A. Schuhl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 107206 (2002).

    T. Katayama, S. Yuasa, J. Velev, M. Ye. Zhuravlev, S. S. Jaswal, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 112503 (2006)APPLAB000089000011112503000001.

    J. Slonczewski, Phys. Rev. B 39, 6995 (1989).

    M. Y. Zhuravlev, E. Y. Tsymbal, and A. V. Vedyayev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 026806 (2005).

    H. -C. Wu, S. K. Arora, O. N. Mryasov, and I. V. Shvets, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 182502 (2008)APPLAB000092000018182502000001.

    Y. F. Chiang, Jared J. I. Wong, X. Tan, Y. Li, K. Pi, W. H. Wang, H. W. K. Tom, and R. K. Kawakami, Phys. Rev. B 79, 184410 (2009).

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).

    P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994), G. Kresse and D. Joubert, ibid. 59, 1758 (1999).

    Y. Wang and J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 44, 13298 (1991).

    W. H. Butler, X. -G. Zhang, T. C. Schulthess, and J. M. MacLaren, Phys. Rev. B 63, 054416 (2001).

    X. Feng, O. Bengone, M. Alouani, S. Lebègue, I. Rungger, and S. Sanvito, Phys. Rev. B 79, 174414 (2009).

    H. L. Meyerheim, R. Popescu, J. Krischner, N. Jedrecy, M. Sauvage-Simkin, B. Heinrich, and R. Pinchaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 076102 (2001).

    I. Theodonis, N. Kioussis, A. Kalitsov, M. Chshiev, and W. H. Butler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 237205 (2006).

    A. Kalitsov, M. Chshiev, I. Theodonis, N. Kioussis, and W. H. Butler, Phys. Rev. B 79, 174416 (2009).


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (4) Tables (1)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close